William v. Luna v. Steven Cambra, Jr., Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General

311 F.3d 928, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11500, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 13400, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24258, 2002 WL 31664771

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 27, 2002·No. 01-55841·Published·Cited by 35 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The mandate is recalled and the opinion filed September 27, 2002 [306 F.3d 954], is amended as follows:

The last sentence of the opinion which reads:

We thus remand this case to the District Court with instructions to issue the writ of habeas corpus, unless California elects to retry Luna within 90 days from the date of the issuance of the mandate in this case.

is amended to read as follows:

We thus remand this case to the District Court with instructions to issue the writ of habeas corpus, unless California elects, within 90 days of the issuance of the mandate, to retry Luna. Any such retrial shall commence within a reasonable time thereafter to be set by the District Court.

The mandate is to reissue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The mandate is recalled and the opinion filed September 27, 2002 [306 F.3d 954], is amended as follows:

The last sentence of the opinion which reads:

We thus remand this case to the District Court with instructions to issue the writ of habeas corpus, unless California elects to retry Luna within 90 days from the date of the issuance of the mandate in this case.

is amended to read as follows:

We thus remand this case to the District Court with instructions to issue the writ of habeas corpus, unless California elects, within 90 days of the issuance of the mandate, to retry Luna. Any such retrial shall commence within a reasonable time thereafter to be set by the District Court.

The mandate is to reissue forthwith.

William v. Luna v. Steven Cambra, Jr., Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, 311 F.3d 928, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11500, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 13400, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24258, 2002 WL 31664771 (9th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

311 F.3d 928 (William v. Luna v. Steven Cambra, Jr., Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Charles Martin v. Jeffrey Nines

Fourth Circuit, 2025

Yun Liao v. Maurice Junious

817 F.3d 678 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Corbett Le Grand v. James Yates

585 F. App'x 641 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)

Cesar Sarausad v. Carol Porter

446 F. App'x 19 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)

Lopez v. Ryan

630 F.3d 1198 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)

David Berry v. Colleen Preciado

400 F. App'x 210 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

Cerda v. HEDGPETCH, KERN STATE PRISON

744 F. Supp. 2d 1058 (C.D. California, 2010)

Young v. Washington

747 F. Supp. 2d 1213 (W.D. Washington, 2010)

Ratliff v. Hedgepeth

712 F. Supp. 2d 1038 (C.D. California, 2010)

James Ray Moore v. Derrick Ollison

377 F. App'x 679 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

George v. ALMAGER

674 F. Supp. 2d 1160 (S.D. California, 2009)

Burt v. Yarborough

313 F. App'x 23 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)

Gladden v. Runnels

279 F. App'x 454 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)

Gomez v. Adams

555 F. Supp. 2d 1070 (C.D. California, 2008)

Black v. Voss

557 F. Supp. 2d 1100 (C.D. California, 2008)

Hallums v. Russo

491 F. Supp. 2d 161 (D. Massachusetts, 2007)

Templeton v. Hill

215 F. App'x 603 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Osumi v. Giurbino

445 F. Supp. 2d 1152 (C.D. California, 2006)

Burton v. Blanks

197 F. App'x 621 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Clifford Lamere v. William Slaughter, Director, Department of Corrections Mike Mahoney, Warden, Montana State Prison

458 F.3d 878 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Opinion

Related