William Toomey v. Anthony Young, Acting Warden, Danbury Federal Correctional Institution, Danbury, Connecticut

589 F.2d 123
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 22, 1979·No. 472·Published

Opinion

589 F.2d 123

William TOOMEY, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Anthony YOUNG, Acting Warden, Danbury Federal Correctional
Institution, Danbury, Connecticut, et al.,
Respondents-Appellants.

No. 472, Docket 78-2091.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued Dec. 21, 1978.
Decided Jan. 22, 1979.

Henry E. Davis, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Philip B. Heymann, Asst. Atty. Gen., and George W. Calhoun, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for respondents-appellants.

Kenneth A. Liebman, Yale Law Student, New Haven, Conn. (Dennis E. Curtis, Judith Resnik, Stephen Wizner, Alice Bussiere and Mary Keller, New Haven, Conn., of counsel), for petitioner-appellee.

Before FEINBERG, MULLIGAN and GURFEIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the orders below on the opinions of the District Court for Connecticut (Hon. Jon O. Newman, Judge ), reported in 442 F.Supp. 387 (1977) and 449 F.Supp. 336 (1978).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Toomey v. Anthony Young, Acting Warden, Danbury Federal Correctional Institution, Danbury, Connecticut, 589 F.2d 123 (2d Cir. 1979).

589 F.2d 123 (William Toomey v. Anthony Young, Acting Warden, Danbury Federal Correctional Institution, Danbury, Connecticut) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toomey v. Young
449 F. Supp. 336 (D. Connecticut, 1978)
Toomey v. Young
442 F. Supp. 387 (D. Connecticut, 1977)