William Thompson v. Michael Young
This text of 1 F. App'x 564 (William Thompson v. Michael Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William Thompson, an Arkansas inmate, appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in which he claimed that Dr. Michael Young was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical condition. After de novo review, see Weaver v. Clarke, 45 F.3d 1253, 1255 (8th Cir.1995), we agree with the district court Thompson failed to state an Eighth Amendment claim against the prison doctor. The Eighth Amendment does not prohibit a prison doctor from exercising his own independent medical judgment, and inmates do not have a constitutional right to any particular type of treatment. See Long v. Nix, 86 F.3d 761, 765 (8th Cir.1996).
*565 Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 F. App'x 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-thompson-v-michael-young-ca8-2001.