William Thomas Watts v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 20, 2013·No. 03-12-00480-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 20, 2013

NO. 03-12-00480-CR

William Thomas Watts, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF CONCHO COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON AND ROSE MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was error in the district court’s

judgment, but that such error does not require the judgment be reversed: IT IS THEREFORE

considered, adjudged and ordered that the judgment of the district court is modified to reflect that

Watts pleaded “not guilty” to the charged offense. As so modified, the judgment of the district

court is affirmed. It FURTHER appearing to the Court that the appellant is indigent and unable

to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified below for

observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Thomas Watts v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

William Thomas Watts v. State (William Thomas Watts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.