William Thad Greenwood v. State
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00152-CR ____________________
WILLIAM THAD GREENWOOD, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 75th District Court Liberty County, Texas Trial Cause No. CR32772 ________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 14, 2018, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed
for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the
appellant explained why he needed more time for filing the record. See Tex. R. App.
P. 37.3(b). The appellant did not file a response. It appears that the appellant is not
entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. There being
no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed
for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN Chief Justice
Submitted on August 28, 2018 Opinion Delivered August 29, 2018 Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William Thad Greenwood v. State (William Thad Greenwood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.