William Terry Harper v. Cheryl Fieglein Harper

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 13, 2011
Docket14-11-00454-CV
StatusPublished

This text of William Terry Harper v. Cheryl Fieglein Harper (William Terry Harper v. Cheryl Fieglein Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Terry Harper v. Cheryl Fieglein Harper, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Motion Granted; Affirmed in Part and Reversed and Remanded in Part; and Memorandum Opinion filed September 13, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00454-CV

WILLIAM TERRY HARPER, Appellant

V.

CHERYL FIEGLEIN HARPER, Appellee


On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-66036


M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

            This is a restricted appeal from a default final decree of divorce signed February 8, 2011.  On June 16, 2011, this court abated the appeal and referred the case to mediation.  On August 15, 2011, the mediator advised this court that the case had settled in mediation. 

            On August 29, 2011, the parties filed a joint motion to reverse the property division portion of the judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of a modified decree in accordance with the terms of the parties’ mediated settlement agreement.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.  We order the appeal reinstated and grant the motion.

            Accordingly, we reverse only those portions of the judgment concerning the parties’ property division, and we remand those portions of the cause to the trial court for rendition of a modified decree of divorce in accordance with the terms of the parties’ mediated settlement agreement.  The remainder of the judgment, including the portion of the judgment granting the parties’ divorce as of February 8, 2011, is affirmed.  The mandate of the court shall issue immediately.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Seymore, and Jamison.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
William Terry Harper v. Cheryl Fieglein Harper, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-terry-harper-v-cheryl-fieglein-harper-texapp-2011.