William Taylor v. Zachary Starr

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 23, 2024
Docket12-24-00156-CV
StatusPublished

This text of William Taylor v. Zachary Starr (William Taylor v. Zachary Starr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Taylor v. Zachary Starr, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

NO. 12-24-00156-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

WILLIAM TAYLOR, § APPEAL FROM THE 413TH APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ZACHARY STARR, APPELLEE § JOHNSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM

Appellant, William Taylor, filed an unopposed motion to set aside the trial court’s judgment and remand the case for rendition of judgment according to the parties’ settlement. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 sets forth the actions that this Court may take in accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). We may: (A) render judgment effectuating the parties’ agreement; (B) set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement; or (C) abate the appeal and permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the agreement. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). Accordingly, we grant the unopposed motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). We render judgment setting aside the trial court’s judgment of February 9, 2024, without regard to the merits. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). We remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See id. Costs on appeal are taxed against the party incurring same.

Opinion delivered October 23, 2024. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

1 COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

OCTOBER 23, 2024

WILLIAM TAYLOR, Appellant V. ZACHARY STARR, Appellee

Appeal from the 413th District Court of Johnson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. DC-C201800354)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the Appellant’s unopposed motion to set aside the trial court’s judgment and remand for rendition of judgment according to the parties’ settlement, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED by this Court that the motion be granted; judgment is rendered setting aside the trial court’s February 9, 2024 judgment without regard to the merits; the cause is remanded to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. Costs on appeal are taxed against the party incurring same.

By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
William Taylor v. Zachary Starr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-taylor-v-zachary-starr-texapp-2024.