William T. Holmes v. Clarence L. Jackson, Jr. Lewis W. Hurst John A. Brown Gail Y. Browne Jacqueline F. Fraser John B. Metzger, III

Fourth Circuit

William T. Holmes v. Clarence L. Jackson, Jr. Lewis W. Hurst John A. Brown Gail Y. Browne Jacqueline F. Fraser John B. Metzger, III

60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24866

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 29, 1995

Docket95-6586

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 822 (William T. Holmes v. Clarence L. Jackson, Jr. Lewis W. Hurst John A. Brown Gail Y. Browne Jacqueline F. Fraser John B. Metzger, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William T. Holmes v. Clarence L. Jackson, Jr. Lewis W. Hurst John A. Brown Gail Y. Browne Jacqueline F. Fraser John B. Metzger, III, 60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24866 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William T. HOLMES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Clarence L. JACKSON, Jr.; Lewis W. Hurst; John A. Brown;
Gail Y. Browne; Jacqueline F. Fraser; John B.
Metzger, III, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6586.

No. 95-6562

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995
Decided June 29, 1995

William T. Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's* orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holmes v. Jackson, No. CA-94-529-R (E.D. Va. Mar. 15, 1995, Apr. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Jurisdiction was appropriate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) (1988)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William T. HOLMES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Clarence L. JACKSON, Jr.; Lewis W. Hurst; John A. Brown;
Gail Y. Browne; Jacqueline F. Fraser; John B.
Metzger, III, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6586.

No. 95-6562

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995
Decided June 29, 1995

William T. Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's* orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holmes v. Jackson, No. CA-94-529-R (E.D. Va. Mar. 15, 1995, Apr. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Jurisdiction was appropriate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) (1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-t-holmes-v-clarence-l-jackson-jr-lewis-w-h-ca4-1995.