William T. Bell & Associates, L. L. P. v. Pyramid Brokerage Co.
281 A.D.2d 942, 722 N.Y.S.2d 208, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2760
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in William T. Bell & Associates, L. L. P. v. Pyramid Brokerage Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 281 A.D.2d 943 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 2001·No. Appeal No. 1·Published
Opinion
—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs (see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; [943]*943Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see also, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Murphy, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Wisner, J. P., Scudder, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William T. Bell & Associates, L. L. P. v. Pyramid Brokerage Co., 281 A.D.2d 942, 722 N.Y.S.2d 208, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2760 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).
281 A.D.2d 942 (William T. Bell & Associates, L. L. P. v. Pyramid Brokerage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)