William T. Beazley Co., Inc. v. Frazier Co., No. 085218 (Jan. 4, 1991)

Connecticut Superior Court

William T. Beazley Co., Inc. v. Frazier Co., No. 085218 (Jan. 4, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 358

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided January 4, 1991·No. No. 085218·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ORDER (#125) The court is persuaded that the attorney trial referee based her decision (memorandum of Decision, dated September 21, 1989) on an application of the requirements of Section. 20-325a of the General Statutes to the facts of the case. Pursuant to the holding in Conda v. Christensen, 11 Conn. App. 557, 564 (1987), the requirements of the statute are inapplicable in the matter of disputes, as here, between brokers.

The motion for judgment is denied, and the matter is remanded to the attorney trial referee for further proceedings.

GAFFNEY, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ORDER (#125) The court is persuaded that the attorney trial referee based her decision (memorandum of Decision, dated September 21, 1989) on an application of the requirements of Section. 20-325a of the General Statutes to the facts of the case. Pursuant to the holding in Conda v. Christensen, 11 Conn. App. 557, 564 (1987), the requirements of the statute are inapplicable in the matter of disputes, as here, between brokers.

The motion for judgment is denied, and the matter is remanded to the attorney trial referee for further proceedings.

GAFFNEY, J.

William T. Beazley Co., Inc. v. Frazier Co., No. 085218 (Jan. 4, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 358 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 358 (William T. Beazley Co., Inc. v. Frazier Co., No. 085218 (Jan. 4, 1991)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related