Home/Connecticut Superior Court/William T. Beazley Co., Inc. v. Frazier Co., No. 085218 (Jan. 4, 1991)

William T. Beazley Co., Inc. v. Frazier Co., No. 085218 (Jan. 4, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 358
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedJanuary 4, 1991
DocketNo. 085218
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 358 (William T. Beazley Co., Inc. v. Frazier Co., No. 085218 (Jan. 4, 1991)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William T. Beazley Co., Inc. v. Frazier Co., No. 085218 (Jan. 4, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 358 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ORDER (#125) The court is persuaded that the attorney trial referee based her decision (memorandum of Decision, dated September 21, 1989) on an application of the requirements of Section. 20-325a of the General Statutes to the facts of the case. Pursuant to the holding in Conda v. Christensen, 11 Conn. App. 557, 564 (1987), the requirements of the statute are inapplicable in the matter of disputes, as here, between brokers.

The motion for judgment is denied, and the matter is remanded to the attorney trial referee for further proceedings.

GAFFNEY, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conda v. Christensen
528 A.2d 1159 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-t-beazley-co-inc-v-frazier-co-no-085218-jan-4-1991-connsuperct-1991.