William Stokeley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

William Stokeley v. State

196 So. 3d 570, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11526, 2016 WL 4064031

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 29, 2016

Docket5D16-861

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 196 So. 3d 570 (William Stokeley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William Stokeley v. State, 196 So. 3d 570, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11526, 2016 WL 4064031 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Stokeley appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm as to Grounds Two, Three, and Four. However, because Stokeley’s first ground for relief is insufficiently pled, see Alcorn v. State, 121 So.3d 419, 430 (Fla.2013), we reverse the summary denial and remand with directions that the trial court dismiss Ground One and provide Stokeley with an opportunity to amend, but only as it relates to his first counsel, Ms. Yeager. See Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754, 762 (Fla.2007).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

LAWSON, C.J., SAWAYA and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

William Stokeley appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm as to Grounds Two, Three, and Four. However, because Stokeley’s first ground for relief is insufficiently pled, see Alcorn v. State, 121 So.3d 419, 430 (Fla.2013), we reverse the summary denial and remand with directions that the trial court dismiss Ground One and provide Stokeley with an opportunity to amend, but only as it relates to his first counsel, Ms. Yeager. See Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754, 762 (Fla.2007).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

LAWSON, C.J., SAWAYA and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 So. 3d 570, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11526, 2016 WL 4064031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-stokeley-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack