William Stokeley v. State

196 So. 3d 570, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11526, 2016 WL 4064031
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 2016·No. 5D16-861·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Stokeley appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm as to Grounds Two, Three, and Four. However, because Stokeley’s first ground for relief is insufficiently pled, see Alcorn v. State, 121 So.3d 419, 430 (Fla.2013), we reverse the summary denial and remand with directions that the trial court dismiss Ground One and provide Stokeley with an opportunity to amend, but only as it relates to his first counsel, Ms. Yeager. See Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754, 762 (Fla.2007).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

LAWSON, C.J., SAWAYA and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Stokeley v. State, 196 So. 3d 570, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11526, 2016 WL 4064031 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

196 So. 3d 570 (William Stokeley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bayou Fleet, Inc. v. Bollinger Shipyards, Inc.
197 So. 3d 797 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)