William Stephen Lush v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 14, 2018·No. 14-18-00409-CR·Published

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 14, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-18-00409-CR

WILLIAM STEPHEN LUSH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1098506

MEMORANDUM OPINION

After a plea of guilty, appellant was convicted of the offense of deadly conduct and sentenced to 30 days in the Harris County Jail on January 22, 2007. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until April 26, 2018.

A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App.

P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Stephen Lush v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

William Stephen Lush v. State (William Stephen Lush v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)