William Spradlin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Sixth Circuit

William Spradlin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

25 F.3d 1050, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21045, 1994 WL 228293

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMay 25, 1994

Docket93-3541

StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1050 (William Spradlin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William Spradlin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 25 F.3d 1050, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21045, 1994 WL 228293 (6th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

25 F.3d 1050
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

William SPRADLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-3541.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 25, 1994.

Before: RYAN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges; KRUPANSKY, Senior Circuit Judge.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Ella Spradlin, appeals the Secretary's decision denying disability benefits to her deceased husband, William Spradlin.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that the decision of the Secretary is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the district court did not err in granting judgment to the Secretary, and the judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed upon the reasoning set forth in the report and recommendations of the magistrate judge dated February 28, 1992 and in the decision and judgment of the district court dated March 8, 1993.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

25 F.3d 1050
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

William SPRADLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-3541.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 25, 1994.

Before: RYAN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges; KRUPANSKY, Senior Circuit Judge.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Ella Spradlin, appeals the Secretary's decision denying disability benefits to her deceased husband, William Spradlin.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that the decision of the Secretary is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the district court did not err in granting judgment to the Secretary, and the judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed upon the reasoning set forth in the report and recommendations of the magistrate judge dated February 28, 1992 and in the decision and judgment of the district court dated March 8, 1993.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 F.3d 1050, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21045, 1994 WL 228293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-spradlin-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-s-ca6-1994.