William Smith, T/a W. Smith Tire Company v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. William Smith, T/a W. Smith Tire Company v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.
This text of 374 F.2d 892 (William Smith, T/a W. Smith Tire Company v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. William Smith, T/a W. Smith Tire Company v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
374 F.2d 892
William SMITH, t/a W. Smith Tire Company, Appellant,
v.
FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER CO.
William SMITH, t/a W. Smith Tire Company
v.
FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER CO., Appellant.
Nos. 16100, 16101.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued March 21, 1967.
Decided April 4, 1967.
See also D.C., 255 F.Supp. 905.
Edwin J. McDermott, Philadelphia, Pa. and Bernard I. Shovlin, Philadelphia, Pa., for Smith.
Harrison G. Kildare, Philadelphia, Pa. (Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., Warrin C. Meyers, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
On review of the record of these appeals at 16100 and 16101, we find no prejudicial error. The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed, each party to bear its own costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
374 F.2d 892, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-smith-ta-w-smith-tire-company-v-firestone-tire-and-rubber-co-ca3-1967.