William Sassanelli and Kellie Sassanelli

CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan
DecidedJanuary 24, 2022
Docket18-50747
StatusUnknown

This text of William Sassanelli and Kellie Sassanelli (William Sassanelli and Kellie Sassanelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Sassanelli and Kellie Sassanelli, (Mich. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: Case No. 18-50747 WILLIAM SASSANELLI, and Chapter 13 KELLIE SASSANELLI, Judge Thomas J. Tucker Debtors. ______________________________/ ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, MOTION TO EXCUSE THE REQUIREMENTS THAT DEBTOR WILLIAM SASSANELLI FILE OFFICIAL FORM 423 AND THE CERTIFICATION REGARDING DOMESTIC SUPPORT OBLIGATIONS This case is before the Court on a motion purportedly filed by both of the Debtors, entitled “Motion to Excuse the Requirements That Co-Debtor, William Sassanelli, File Official Form 423 and the Certification Regarding Domestic Support Obligations” (Docket # 84, the “Motion”). The Motion seeks a waiver of certain filing requirements of the Debtor William Sassanelli, but the Motion also states that “Co-Debtor, William Sassanelli, passed away on October 16, 2020.” (Motion at ¶ 3.) The Motion must be denied because it was not filed by or on behalf of anyone with standing to seek the relief sought. The Motion was filed by the Debtor Kellie Sassanelli, but the Motion does not show that Kellie Sassanelli has standing or authority to file a motion on behalf of the deceased debtor. Only a personal representative duly appointed by the probate court under the laws of the State of Michigan may file a motion seeking relief on behalf of the deceased Debtor, William Sassanelli. See In re Pack, No. 18-48350, 2021 WL 4927556 (Bankr. E.D. Mich., October 21, 2021); In re Hamilton, 274 B.R. 266, 267 (W.D. Tex. 2001) (citing In re Lucio, 251 B.R. 705, 708-09 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2000)) (“[W]hen a debtor dies, the only person who can then appear on the debtor’s behalf is the person so named as the official representative of the probate estate of the debtor.”); Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 700.3103 (stating, in relevant part, that “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in article IV, to acquire the powers and undertake the duties and liabilities of a decedent’s personal representative, a person must be appointed by the register or by court order, must qualify, and must be issued letters”); Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 700.3703(3) (stating that “[e]xcept as to a proceeding that does not survive the decedent’s death, a personal representative of a decedent domiciled in this state at death has the same standing to sue and be sued in the courts of this state and the courts of another jurisdiction as the decedent had immediately prior to death”). The Motion does not allege or demonstrate that Kellie Sassanelli is the personal representative of the deceased Debtor William Sassanelli. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion (Docket # 84) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is without prejudice to the right of a duly appointed personal representative of the deceased Debtor to file a motion seeking the same relief that was sought by the present Motion. The Court expresses no view, at this time, about the merits of any such potential future motion.

Signed on January 24, 2021 Sp, Ky, > /s/ Thomas J. Tucker Bye Lhomas J. Tucker KS United States Bankruptcy Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Lucio
251 B.R. 705 (W.D. Texas, 2000)
In Re Hamilton
274 B.R. 266 (W.D. Texas, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
William Sassanelli and Kellie Sassanelli, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-sassanelli-and-kellie-sassanelli-mieb-2022.