11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 1100 1111 1122 1133 1144 1155 1166 1177 1188 1199 2200 2211 2222 2233 2244 2255 2266 2277 2288 {06413573.1} STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER PLL elaG & repooC dranyaM 0541 etiuS ,retneC oredacrabmE owT 11149 AC ,ocsicnarF naS 0074-646 )514( Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:135 NICHOLAS J. BOOS (SBN 233399) nboos@maynardcooper.com NORMAN LAU (SBN 253690) nlau@maynardcooper.com MAYNARD COOPER & GALE LLP Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1450 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 646-4700 Facsimile: (205) 254-1999 NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT Attorneys for Defendant OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILLIAM SALPAKA, an individual Case No. 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK and in his capacity as TRUSTEE OF THE SALPAKA REVOCABLE TRUST U/T 4-26-89; VIRGINA SALPAKA, an STIPULATED PROTECTIVE individual and in her capacity as ORDER EXCEPT AS MODIFIED TRUSTEE OF THE SALPAKA BY THE COURT REVOCABLE TRUST U/T 4-26-89
Plaintiffs,
v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation; and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Defendants.
It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiffs William Sapaka and Virginia Salpaka, individually and in their capacities as Trustees of The Salpaka Revocable Trust, on the one hand, and Ohio Security Insurance Company, on the other hand, by and through their respective attorneys of record, as follows: A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 2 of 17 Page ID #:136
1 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 2 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 3 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 4 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 5 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 6 under the applicable legal principles. 7 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 8 This action is likely to involve trade secrets, customer and pricing lists and 9 other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical and/or 10 proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and 11 from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such 12 confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other 13 things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding 14 confidential business practices, or other confidential research, development, or 15 commercial information (including information implicating privacy rights of third 16 parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be 17 privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, 18 court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of 19 information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of 20 discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to 21 keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses 22 of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their 23 handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order 24 for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that 25 information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that 26 nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a 27 confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part 28 of the public record of this case. {06413573.1} 2 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 3 of 17 Page ID #:137
1 C. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF PROCEDURE FOR FILING UNDER 2 SEAL 3 The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this 4 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 5 under seal; Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed 6 and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court 7 to file material under seal. 8 There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial 9 proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive motions, 10 good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana v. City and 11 County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. Motors 12 Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. Sony Electrics, 13 Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated protective orders 14 require good cause showing), and a specific showing of good cause or compelling 15 reasons with proper evidentiary support and legal justification, must be made with 16 respect to Protected Material that a party seeks to file under seal. The parties’ mere 17 designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not— 18 without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the 19 material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as confidential, privileged, or 20 otherwise protectable—constitute good cause. 21 Further, if a party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, 22 then compelling reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and 23 the relief sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be 24 protected. See Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n., 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 25 2010). For each item or type of information, document, or thing sought to be filed 26 or introduced under seal in connection with a dispositive motion or trial, the party 27 seeking protection must articulate compelling reasons, supported by specific facts 28 and legal justification, for the requested sealing order. Again, competent evidence {06413573.1} 3 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 4 of 17 Page ID #:138
1 supporting the application to file documents under seal must be provided by 2 declaration. 3 Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in 4 its entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted. 5 If documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, omitting 6 only the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the document, 7 shall be filed. Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in their 8 entirety should include an explanation of why redaction is not feasible. 9 2. DEFINITIONS 10 2.1 Action: William Salpaka, et al. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 11 et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK. 12 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 13 designation of information or items under this Order. 14 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 15 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 16 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in 17 the Good Cause Statement. 18 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 19 their support staff).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 1100 1111 1122 1133 1144 1155 1166 1177 1188 1199 2200 2211 2222 2233 2244 2255 2266 2277 2288 {06413573.1} STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER PLL elaG & repooC dranyaM 0541 etiuS ,retneC oredacrabmE owT 11149 AC ,ocsicnarF naS 0074-646 )514( Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:135 NICHOLAS J. BOOS (SBN 233399) nboos@maynardcooper.com NORMAN LAU (SBN 253690) nlau@maynardcooper.com MAYNARD COOPER & GALE LLP Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1450 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 646-4700 Facsimile: (205) 254-1999 NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT Attorneys for Defendant OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILLIAM SALPAKA, an individual Case No. 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK and in his capacity as TRUSTEE OF THE SALPAKA REVOCABLE TRUST U/T 4-26-89; VIRGINA SALPAKA, an STIPULATED PROTECTIVE individual and in her capacity as ORDER EXCEPT AS MODIFIED TRUSTEE OF THE SALPAKA BY THE COURT REVOCABLE TRUST U/T 4-26-89
Plaintiffs,
v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts corporation; and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Defendants.
It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiffs William Sapaka and Virginia Salpaka, individually and in their capacities as Trustees of The Salpaka Revocable Trust, on the one hand, and Ohio Security Insurance Company, on the other hand, by and through their respective attorneys of record, as follows: A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 2 of 17 Page ID #:136
1 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 2 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 3 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 4 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 5 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 6 under the applicable legal principles. 7 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 8 This action is likely to involve trade secrets, customer and pricing lists and 9 other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical and/or 10 proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and 11 from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such 12 confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other 13 things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding 14 confidential business practices, or other confidential research, development, or 15 commercial information (including information implicating privacy rights of third 16 parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be 17 privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, 18 court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of 19 information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of 20 discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to 21 keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses 22 of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their 23 handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order 24 for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that 25 information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that 26 nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a 27 confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part 28 of the public record of this case. {06413573.1} 2 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 3 of 17 Page ID #:137
1 C. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF PROCEDURE FOR FILING UNDER 2 SEAL 3 The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this 4 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 5 under seal; Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed 6 and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court 7 to file material under seal. 8 There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial 9 proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive motions, 10 good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana v. City and 11 County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. Motors 12 Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. Sony Electrics, 13 Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated protective orders 14 require good cause showing), and a specific showing of good cause or compelling 15 reasons with proper evidentiary support and legal justification, must be made with 16 respect to Protected Material that a party seeks to file under seal. The parties’ mere 17 designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not— 18 without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the 19 material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as confidential, privileged, or 20 otherwise protectable—constitute good cause. 21 Further, if a party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, 22 then compelling reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and 23 the relief sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be 24 protected. See Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n., 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 25 2010). For each item or type of information, document, or thing sought to be filed 26 or introduced under seal in connection with a dispositive motion or trial, the party 27 seeking protection must articulate compelling reasons, supported by specific facts 28 and legal justification, for the requested sealing order. Again, competent evidence {06413573.1} 3 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 4 of 17 Page ID #:138
1 supporting the application to file documents under seal must be provided by 2 declaration. 3 Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in 4 its entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted. 5 If documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, omitting 6 only the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the document, 7 shall be filed. Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in their 8 entirety should include an explanation of why redaction is not feasible. 9 2. DEFINITIONS 10 2.1 Action: William Salpaka, et al. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 11 et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK. 12 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 13 designation of information or items under this Order. 14 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 15 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 16 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in 17 the Good Cause Statement. 18 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 19 their support staff). 20 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 21 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 22 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 23 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 24 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 25 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced 26 or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 27 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 28 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as {06413573.1} 4 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 5 of 17 Page ID #:139
1 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 2 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 3 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 4 counsel. 5 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association or 6 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 7 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a 8 party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and 9 have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm 10 that has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 11 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 12 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 13 support staffs). 14 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 15 Discovery Material in this Action. 16 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation 17 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 18 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 19 and their employees and subcontractors. 20 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 21 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 22 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 23 Material from a Producing Party. 24 3. SCOPE 25 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 26 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 27 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 28 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or {06413573.1} 5 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 6 of 17 Page ID #:140
1 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 2 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the 3 trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 4 4. DURATION 5 Once a case proceeds to trial, information that was designated as 6 CONFIDENTIAL or maintained pursuant to this protective order used or 7 introduced as an exhibit at trial becomes public and will be presumptively available 8 to all members of the public, including the press, unless compelling reasons 9 supported by specific factual findings to proceed otherwise are made to the trial 10 judge in advance of the trial. See Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 11 F.3d 1172, 1180-81 (9th Cir. 2006) (distinguishing “good cause” showing for 12 sealing documents produced in discovery from “compelling reasons” standard when 13 merits-related documents are part of court record). Accordingly, the terms of this 14 protective order do not extend beyond the commencement of the trial. 15 5. DESIGNATED PROTECTED MATERIAL 16 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 17 Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under 18 this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that 19 qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for 20 protection only those parts of material, documents, items or oral or written 21 communications that qualify so that other portions of the material, documents, 22 items or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept 23 unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 24 Mass, indiscriminate or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations 25 that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper 26 purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to 27 impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the 28 Designating Party to sanctions. {06413573.1} 6 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 7 of 17 Page ID #:141
1 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it 2 designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must 3 promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the inapplicable designation. 4 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in 5 this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise 6 stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection 7 under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or 8 produced. 9 Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 10 (a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic 11 documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial 12 proceedings), that the Producing Party affix at a minimum, the legend 13 “CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter “CONFIDENTIAL legend”), to each page that 14 contains protected material. If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 17 A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents available for inspection 18 need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated 19 which documents it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and 20 before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be 21 deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the 22 documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine 23 which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, 24 before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the 25 “CONFIDENTIAL legend” to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a 26 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 27 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 28 in the margins). {06413573.1} 7 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 8 of 17 Page ID #:142
1 (b) for testimony given in depositions that the Designating Party identifies 2 the Disclosure or Discovery Material on the record, before the close of the 3 deposition all protected testimony. 4 (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and 5 for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on 6 the exterior of the container or containers in which the information is stored the 7 legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the information 8 warrants protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the 9 protected portion(s). 10 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent 11 failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive 12 the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such 13 material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make 14 reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the 15 provisions of this Order. 16 6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 17 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a 18 designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s 19 Scheduling Order. 20 6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute 21 resolution process under Local Rule 37-1 et seq. 22 6.3 Joint Stipulation. Any challenge submitted to the Court shall be via a 23 joint stipulation pursuant to Local Rule 37-2. 24 6.4 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on 25 the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper 26 purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other 27 parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating 28 Party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties shall {06413573.1} 8 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 9 of 17 Page ID #:143
1 continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is 2 entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the Court rules on the 3 challenge. 4 7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 5 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is 6 disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this 7 Action only for prosecuting, defending or attempting to settle this Action. Such 8 Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the 9 conditions described in this Order. When the Action has been terminated, a 10 Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL 11 DISPOSITION). 12 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a 13 location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons 14 authorized under this Order. 15 7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless 16 otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 17 Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated 18 “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: 19 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as 20 well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably 21 necessary to disclose the information for this Action; 22 (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of 23 the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action; 24 (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom 25 disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the 26 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 27 (d) the court and its personnel; 28 (e) court reporters and their staff; {06413573.1} 9 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 10 of 17 Page ID #:144
1 (f) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional 2 Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have 3 signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 4 (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a 5 custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information; 6 (h) during their depositions, witnesses, and attorneys for witnesses, in the 7 Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (1) the deposing party 8 requests that the witness sign the form attached as Exhibit A hereto; and (2) they 9 will not be permitted to keep any confidential information unless they sign the 10 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise 11 agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed 12 deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material may 13 be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone 14 except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; and 15 (i) any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel, 16 mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions. 17 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED 18 IN OTHER LITIGATION 19 If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation 20 that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as 21 “CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must: 22 (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification 23 shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; 24 (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order 25 to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the 26 subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include 27 a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and 28 (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be {06413573.1} 10 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 11 of 17 Page ID #:145
1 pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected. 2 If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with 3 the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this 4 action as “CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the 5 subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s 6 permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking 7 protection in that court of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions 8 should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action 9 to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 10 9. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE 11 PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION 12 (a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a 13 Non-Party in this Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information 14 produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the 15 remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be 16 construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections. 17 (b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to 18 produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is 19 subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s 20 confidential information, then the Party shall: 21 (1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non- 22 Party that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality 23 agreement with a Non-Party; 24 (2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated 25 Protective Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably 26 specific description of the information requested; and 27 (3) make the information requested available for inspection by the 28 Non-Party, if requested. {06413573.1} 11 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 12 of 17 Page ID #:146
1 (c) If the Non-Party fails to seek a protective order from this court within 2 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party 3 may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery 4 request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall 5 not produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to the 6 confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by the court. 7 Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and 8 expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material. 9 10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 10 If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed 11 Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this 12 Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in 13 writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best 14 efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the 15 person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of 16 this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment 17 and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 18 11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE 19 PROTECTED MATERIAL 20 When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain 21 inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other 22 protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal 23 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify 24 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 25 production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 26 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure 27 of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work 28 product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated {06413573.1} 12 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 13 of 17 Page ID #:147
1 protective order submitted to the court. 2 12. MISCELLANEOUS 3 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any 4 person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 5 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this 6 Protective Order, no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to 7 disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in 8 this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on 9 any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective 10 Order. 11 12.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any 12 Protected Material must comply with Local Civil Rule 79-5. Protected Material 13 may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the 14 specific Protected Material at issue. If a Party’s request to file Protected Material 15 under seal is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information 16 in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the court. 17 13. FINAL DISPOSITION 18 After the final disposition of this Action, as defined in paragraph 4, within 60 19 days of a written request by the Designating Party, each Receiving Party must 20 return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As 21 used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, 22 compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the 23 Protected Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the 24 Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if 25 not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that 26 (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was 27 returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any 28 copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or {06413573.1} 13 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 14 of 17 Page ID #:148
1 capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel 2 are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, 3 deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition 4 and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert 5 work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival 6 copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective 7 Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION). 8 14. VIOLATION 9 Any violation of this Order may be punished by appropriate measures 10 including, without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary sanctions. 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 12 We hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this stipulation was 13 obtained by each of the below identified signatories. 14 DATED: June 2, 2022 MAYNARD COOPER AND GALE LLP 15 /s/ Norman Lau 16 Nicholas J. Boos 17 Norman Lau Attorneys for Defendant 18 OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY 19
20 DATED: June 2, 2022 ENGSTROM, LIPSCOMB & LACK, P.C. 21 22 /s/ Andrew Jaconson Andrew M. Jacobson 23 Attorneys for Plaintiff WILLIAM SALPAKA, et al. 24
25 26 27 28 {06413573.1} 14 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2?1-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page15o0f17 Page ID#:149
1}|} FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. , || DATED: _June 6, 2022 — Shorr 4 HON. STEVE KIM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {06413573.1} is STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page 16 of 17 Page ID #:150
1 EXHIBIT A 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 3 4 I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of 5 _______________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury 6 that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was 7 issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California on 8 _________[date] in the case of William Salpaka, et al. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 9 Company, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-04435-FMO-SK. I agree to comply with and to 10 be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and 11 acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment 12 in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner 13 any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any 14 person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. 15 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the 16 Central District of California for enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective 17 Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. 18 I hereby appoint ________________________________ [print or type full name] of 19 ________________________________________________ [print or type full address and 20 telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with 21 this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective 22 Order. 23 Date: _______________________________________ 24 City and State where sworn and signed: 25 26 Printed name:
27 28 Signature:
{06413573.1} 16 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2?1-cv-04435-FMO-SK Document 24 Filed 06/06/22 Page17of17 Page ID#:151
1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2|}| STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Iam employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. lam | 4|| over the age of 21 and am not a party to the within action. My business address is Maynard, Cooper & Gale, LLP, Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1450, San _ 5|| Francisco, California 94111. On the date indicated below, I served the foregoing document described as: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER on the interested parties in this action by placing: [ ] the original document - OR- 8 [x] a true and correct copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as ollows: Walter J. Lack (SBN So) 10 Steven C. Shuman (SBN 828 8) Andrew M. Jacobson (SBN 2863 0) 11 ENGSTROM, LIPSCOMB & LACK, P.C. 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 1200 12 Los Angeles, CA 90067-4113 sshuman@elllaw.com 13 ajacobson elllaw.com ttorneys for Plaintiffs 14 [X]_ BY MAIL: I caused such envelope(s) to be deposited in the mail at San 15 Francisco, California. The envelope(s) was (were) mailed with postage fully prepaid. I am “readily familiar” with this firm’s practice of collection and 16 processing correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with U.S. postal service on the same day in the ordinary course of business. 17 [X] BY E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION: Based on a court | 18 order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the documents to be sent from email address 19 bday@maynardcooper.com to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed above. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any 20 electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. 21 _ I declare that I am employed in the office of a member who has been admitted to the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing 23 |) is true and correct. 24 Executed on June 2, 2022, in San Francisco, California. 25 7) r 26 aon { Jaw Brian Day 27 28 {06413573.1} 17 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER