William S. Tindol v. United States

819 F.2d 290, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 6742, 1987 WL 37485
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 27, 1987
Docket87-5259
StatusUnpublished

This text of 819 F.2d 290 (William S. Tindol v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William S. Tindol v. United States, 819 F.2d 290, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 6742, 1987 WL 37485 (6th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

819 F.2d 290

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
William S. TINDOL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 87-5259.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 27, 1987.

Before KEITH and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Appellant has responded to this court's order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

On December 29, 1986, the district court entered judgment granting defendant's motion to dismiss. The notice of appeal was due within 60 day of entry thereof--February 27, 1987. Rules 4(a) and 26(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until March 2, 1987, and is, therefore, three days late. He did not seek nor was he granted an extension of time within which to file his notice of appeal.

Because the notice of appeal was untimely filed, this court is deprived of jurisdiction. Compliance with Rule 4(a) is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this court can neither waive nor extend. Peake v. First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 717 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1983).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this appeal be dismissed. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
819 F.2d 290, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 6742, 1987 WL 37485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-s-tindol-v-united-states-ca6-1987.