William S. Smith, Jr., and Marion R. Smith v. Cooper/t. Smith Corporation

Fifth Circuit

William S. Smith, Jr., and Marion R. Smith v. Cooper/t. Smith Corporation

850 F.2d 1086, 1988 WL 78526

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 1, 1988·No. 87-3247·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 7, 1988, 5 Cir., 1988, 846 F.2d 325)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAYLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court m active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 7, 1988, 5 Cir., 1988, 846 F.2d 325)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAYLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court m active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.

William S. Smith, Jr., and Marion R. Smith v. Cooper/t. Smith Corporation, 850 F.2d 1086, 1988 WL 78526 (5th Cir. 1988).

Pincite

850 F.2d 1086 (William S. Smith, Jr., and Marion R. Smith v. Cooper/t. Smith Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related