William S. Burroughs, Jr. v. American City Business Journals, Incorporated

Fourth Circuit

William S. Burroughs, Jr. v. American City Business Journals, Incorporated

57 F.3d 1065, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21790, 1995 WL 365984

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 19, 1995

Docket92-2557

StatusPublished

This text of 57 F.3d 1065 (William S. Burroughs, Jr. v. American City Business Journals, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William S. Burroughs, Jr. v. American City Business Journals, Incorporated, 57 F.3d 1065, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21790, 1995 WL 365984 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

57 F.3d 1065
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William S. BURROUGHS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN CITY BUSINESS JOURNALS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-2557.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 1995.
Decided: June 19, 1995.

William S. Burroughs, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Robert R. Vieth, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, McLean, VA, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to file an amended complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and order, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court in its memorandum accompanying the original motion to dismiss. Burroughs v. American City Business Journals, Inc., No. CA92-1334-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 19, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

57 F.3d 1065
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William S. BURROUGHS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN CITY BUSINESS JOURNALS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-2557.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 1995.
Decided: June 19, 1995.

William S. Burroughs, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Robert R. Vieth, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, McLean, VA, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to file an amended complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and order, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court in its memorandum accompanying the original motion to dismiss. Burroughs v. American City Business Journals, Inc., No. CA92-1334-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 19, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 F.3d 1065, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21790, 1995 WL 365984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-s-burroughs-jr-v-american-city-business-jo-ca4-1995.