William Rucker v. David Kyle Wilson, Jerry Hansbro, and Brenda Sims
This text of William Rucker v. David Kyle Wilson, Jerry Hansbro, and Brenda Sims (William Rucker v. David Kyle Wilson, Jerry Hansbro, and Brenda Sims) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00059-CV ___________________________
WILLIAM RUCKER, Appellant
V.
DAVID KYLE WILSON, JERRY HANSBRO, AND BRENDA SIMS, Appellees
On Appeal from the 415th District Court Parker County, Texas Trial Court No. CV19-2022
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant’s brief was due on April 13, 2022, but he did not file a brief. On
April 29, 2022, we notified Appellant that his brief had not been filed as the Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedure require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1, 38.6(a). We warned
that we could dismiss his appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days,
Appellant filed a brief along with a motion explaining the brief’s untimeliness. See
Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). More than thirty days have passed, but
Appellant has still not filed a brief. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal.
Per Curiam
Delivered: June 16, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William Rucker v. David Kyle Wilson, Jerry Hansbro, and Brenda Sims, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-rucker-v-david-kyle-wilson-jerry-hansbro-and-brenda-sims-texapp-2022.