William Reid Black v. United States
This text of 367 F.2d 580 (William Reid Black v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant Black was convicted by a jury upon an indictment charging him with the theft of merchandise from an interstate shipment in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659. Upon careful consideration of the briefs filed, the oral arguments of counsel and the entire record, we affirm the judgment below.
On appeal appellant assigns as error the District Court’s instructions to the jury concerning an interstate shipment and the weight to be given to the testimony of an accomplice. Appellant offered no objection below to the instructions as required by Rule 30 of the Fed *581 eral Rules of Criminal Procedure and, although Rule 52(b) permits this court to notice plain error affecting substantial rights, we find no such error here.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
367 F.2d 580, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-reid-black-v-united-states-ca4-1966.