William R. Wesson, Anne G. Wesson and John Charles Vaiani v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission

D.C. Circuit

William R. Wesson, Anne G. Wesson and John Charles Vaiani v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission

711 F.2d 418, 229 U.S. App. D.C. 140, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25632

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJuly 22, 1983

Docket83-1282

StatusPublished

This text of 711 F.2d 418 (William R. Wesson, Anne G. Wesson and John Charles Vaiani v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William R. Wesson, Anne G. Wesson and John Charles Vaiani v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, 711 F.2d 418, 229 U.S. App. D.C. 140, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25632 (D.C. Cir. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM:

William Wesson, Anne Wesson and John Vaiani (Petitioners) filed a petition for review of an ICC order denying rehearing of a matter — the proper valuation of their Class B stock after recapitalization of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company — which has been litigated in various forums. See Missouri Pacific Railroad Company Securities, 347 ICC 377 (1973).

We have once before determined that the claim raised by the petition is barred by res judicata. Wesson v. ICC, No. 79-1513 (D.C. Cir. March 25, 1981) (unpublished). The Interstate Commerce Commission reached the identical conclusion. No issue warranting departure from well-established preclusion doctrine appears in the papers before us. It is therefore,

ORDERED by the Court that the order of the Interstate Commerce Commission sought to be reviewed is affirmed.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI