William R. Nami v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
This text of William R. Nami v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (William R. Nami v. Union Pacific Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBERS 13-13-00057-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
WILLIAM R. NAMI, Appellant,
v.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 267th District Court of DeWitt County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, William R. Nami, perfected a cross-appeal from a judgment entered by
the 267th District Court of DeWitt County, Texas, in cause number 10-04-21,519 (Union
Pacific Railroad Company v. William R. Nami appellate cause number 13-12-00673-CV).
This cause is presently before the Court on appellant’s motion to withdraw the appeal.
Appellant requests that this Court withdraw the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to
withdraw the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)
("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").
Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 14th day of February, 2013.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William R. Nami v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-r-nami-v-union-pacific-railroad-company-texapp-2013.