William R. Bush Construction Co. v. Withnell

Missouri Court of Appeals

William R. Bush Construction Co. v. Withnell

175 S.W. 264, 190 Mo. App. 47, 1915 Mo. App. LEXIS 403

DecidedApril 6, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 175 S.W. 264 (William R. Bush Construction Co. v. Withnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William R. Bush Construction Co. v. Withnell, 175 S.W. 264, 190 Mo. App. 47, 1915 Mo. App. LEXIS 403 (Mo. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

NORTONI, J.- —

This is a suit on a special tax hill issued by the city authorities of St. Louis -in favor of plaintiff on June 29, 1907, in the amount of $342.30, in compensation for the construction of a street, to the benefit of the property described. The facts are identical in all respects with those in the case of William R. Bush Construction Co. v. Withnell, ante, p. 33, except the tax hill is against a different lot of ground. The record is in all respects like that in the case mentioned. So, too, are the questions for consideration here and the argument which relates to them. This appeal is to he disposed of in accordance with the judgment given in the case above cited.

Por the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is affirmed. It is so ordered.

Reynold's, P. J., and Allen, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NORTONI, J.- —

This is a suit on a special tax hill issued by the city authorities of St. Louis -in favor of plaintiff on June 29, 1907, in the amount of $342.30, in compensation for the construction of a street, to the benefit of the property described. The facts are identical in all respects with those in the case of William R. Bush Construction Co. v. Withnell, ante, p. 33, except the tax hill is against a different lot of ground. The record is in all respects like that in the case mentioned. So, too, are the questions for consideration here and the argument which relates to them. This appeal is to he disposed of in accordance with the judgment given in the case above cited.

Por the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is affirmed. It is so ordered.

Reynold's, P. J., and Allen, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 S.W. 264, 190 Mo. App. 47, 1915 Mo. App. LEXIS 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-r-bush-construction-co-v-withnell-moctapp-1915.