William R. and Susan M. Knoderer v. State Farm Lloyds, Penni Perkins and Tom Roberts

Court of Appeals of Texas

William R. and Susan M. Knoderer v. State Farm Lloyds, Penni Perkins and Tom Roberts

DecidedDecember 30, 2014

Docket06-13-00027-CV

StatusPublished

This text of William R. and Susan M. Knoderer v. State Farm Lloyds, Penni Perkins and Tom Roberts (William R. and Susan M. Knoderer v. State Farm Lloyds, Penni Perkins and Tom Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William R. and Susan M. Knoderer v. State Farm Lloyds, Penni Perkins and Tom Roberts, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE TO THE 354TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUNT COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 19th day of September, A.D. 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

William R. and Susan M. Knoderer, No. 06-13-00027-CV Appellants Trial Court No. 74,037 v.

State Farm Lloyds, Penni Perkins and Tom Roberts, Appellees

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and render judgment deleting all sanctions against Susan and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion including, at the discretion of the trial court, an assessment of other lesser sanctions against William. We further order that the appellees, State Farm Lloyds and Tom Roberts, pay all costs of this appeal. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 30th day of December, A.D. 2014.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE TO THE 354TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUNT COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 19th day of September, A.D. 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

William R. and Susan M. Knoderer, No. 06-13-00027-CV Appellants Trial Court No. 74,037 v.

State Farm Lloyds, Penni Perkins and Tom Roberts, Appellees

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and render judgment deleting all sanctions against Susan and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion including, at the discretion of the trial court, an assessment of other lesser sanctions against William. We further order that the appellees, State Farm Lloyds and Tom Roberts, pay all costs of this appeal. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 30th day of December, A.D. 2014.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

William R. and Susan M. Knoderer v. State Farm Lloyds, Penni Perkins and Tom Roberts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-r-and-susan-m-knoderer-v-state-farm-lloyds-penni-perkins-and-texapp-2014.