William Paul Hiatt v. Doyal Smith, Warden, Putnam County Prison

455 F.2d 979, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11541
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 1, 1972·No. 71-2512·Published

Opinion

455 F.2d 979

William Paul HIATT, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Doyal SMITH, Warden, Putnam County Prison, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 71-2512 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 1, 1972.

Edward T. M. Garland, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant.

Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen. of Ga., Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Courtney Wilder Stanton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dorothy T. Beasley, W. Hensell Harris, Jr., Deputy Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.

Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On the basis of our decision in Smith v. Smith, 5th Cir. 1971, 454 F.2d 572, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.

*

Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Paul Hiatt v. Doyal Smith, Warden, Putnam County Prison, 455 F.2d 979, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11541 (5th Cir. 1972).

455 F.2d 979 (William Paul Hiatt v. Doyal Smith, Warden, Putnam County Prison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related