William Paul Hiatt v. Doyal Smith, Warden, Putnam County Prison
This text of 455 F.2d 979 (William Paul Hiatt v. Doyal Smith, Warden, Putnam County Prison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
455 F.2d 979
William Paul HIATT, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Doyal SMITH, Warden, Putnam County Prison, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 71-2512 Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 1, 1972.
Edward T. M. Garland, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant.
Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen. of Ga., Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Courtney Wilder Stanton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dorothy T. Beasley, W. Hensell Harris, Jr., Deputy Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.
Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
On the basis of our decision in Smith v. Smith, 5th Cir. 1971, 454 F.2d 572, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
455 F.2d 979, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-paul-hiatt-v-doyal-smith-warden-putnam-county-prison-ca5-1972.