William Parr v. Samuel L. Batts, Warden James A. Smith, Regional Administrator Ronald Angelone, Director of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

William Parr v. Samuel L. Batts, Warden James A. Smith, Regional Administrator Ronald Angelone, Director of Corrections

74 F.3d 1233, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39034, 1996 WL 24750

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 24, 1996

Docket95-7525

StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1233 (William Parr v. Samuel L. Batts, Warden James A. Smith, Regional Administrator Ronald Angelone, Director of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William Parr v. Samuel L. Batts, Warden James A. Smith, Regional Administrator Ronald Angelone, Director of Corrections, 74 F.3d 1233, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39034, 1996 WL 24750 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

74 F.3d 1233
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William PARR, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Samuel L. BATTS, Warden; James A. Smith, Regional
Administrator; Ronald Angelone, Director of
Corrections, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7525.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 24, 1996.

William Parr, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parr v. Batts, No. CA-95-292-AM (E.D.Va., Sept. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

74 F.3d 1233
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William PARR, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Samuel L. BATTS, Warden; James A. Smith, Regional
Administrator; Ronald Angelone, Director of
Corrections, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7525.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 24, 1996.

William Parr, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parr v. Batts, No. CA-95-292-AM (E.D.Va., Sept. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 F.3d 1233, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39034, 1996 WL 24750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-parr-v-samuel-l-batts-warden-james-a-smith-ca4-1996.