WILLIAM P. RAGUSA v. VICTORIA M. RAGUSA
This text of WILLIAM P. RAGUSA v. VICTORIA M. RAGUSA (WILLIAM P. RAGUSA v. VICTORIA M. RAGUSA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
WILLIAM P. RAGUSA, Appellant,
v.
VICTORIA M. RAGUSA, Appellee.
No. 4D21-689
[November 24, 2021]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Karen M. Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2018-DR-008641- XXXX-NB.
William P. Ragusa, Boynton Beach, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that “[w]ithout a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory,” and “[w]ithout knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal”); Esaw v. Esaw, 965 So. 2d 1261, 1264 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (“The most salient impediment to meaningful review of the trial court’s decision is not the absence of findings, but the absence of a transcript.”).
GROSS, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
WILLIAM P. RAGUSA v. VICTORIA M. RAGUSA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-p-ragusa-v-victoria-m-ragusa-fladistctapp-2021.