William Other Kitchens v. United States

Fifth Circuit

William Other Kitchens v. United States

295 F.2d 508

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 6, 1961

Docket18990_1

StatusPublished

This text of 295 F.2d 508 (William Other Kitchens v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William Other Kitchens v. United States, 295 F.2d 508 (5th Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

*509 PER curiam:.

It appearing that although no motion to suppress the evidence found by the alleged illegal search was made prior to trial, such motion was made and passed upon by the trial court at the trial. The procedure followed fully complies with the requirements of Rule 41(e), Federal Rules Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. We find no error in the manner in which this matter was handled by the trial court or in his decision thereabout.

No other errors appearing, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*509 PER curiam:.

It appearing that although no motion to suppress the evidence found by the alleged illegal search was made prior to trial, such motion was made and passed upon by the trial court at the trial. The procedure followed fully complies with the requirements of Rule 41(e), Federal Rules Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. We find no error in the manner in which this matter was handled by the trial court or in his decision thereabout.

No other errors appearing, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 F.2d 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-other-kitchens-v-united-states-ca5-1961.