William Noyes & Co. v. Brent

18 F. Cas. 467, 5 D.C. 551, 5 Cranch 551
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedMarch 15, 1839
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 F. Cas. 467 (William Noyes & Co. v. Brent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Noyes & Co. v. Brent, 18 F. Cas. 467, 5 D.C. 551, 5 Cranch 551 (circtddc 1839).

Opinion

The Court, however,

(Thruston, J.

absent,) was of opinion that the garnishee, if he acted bon& ficle, was entitled to a reasonable compensation for his services in taking care of the goods, and selling them, whoever might be entitled to the net proceeds.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heirs v. Heirs
3 Miss. 915 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1838)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 F. Cas. 467, 5 D.C. 551, 5 Cranch 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-noyes-co-v-brent-circtddc-1839.