William Nay Wood v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas

327 F.2d 81
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 31, 1964
Docket7500_1
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 327 F.2d 81 (William Nay Wood v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Nay Wood v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas, 327 F.2d 81 (10th Cir. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding in which petitioner, Wood, challenges the validity of five sentences for 30 years each which he is now serving in the Kansas State Penitentiary. The petitioner appeals from an order discharging the writ remanding him to the custody of the respondent warden.

Wood is also serving, concurrently with the 30 year sentences, another, separate and as yet uncompleted sentence of not less than 10 years. The validity of this sentence is not questioned.

It is well settled that habeas, corpus will not lie when the prisoner will not be entitled to immediate release if there is a determination in his favor in the proceeding. Crawford v. Taylor, 10 Cir., 290 F.2d 197; McGann v. Taylor, 10 Cir., 289 F.2d 820, cert. denied 368. U.S. 904, 82 S.Ct. 182, 7 L.Ed.2d 98.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
327 F.2d 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-nay-wood-v-sherman-h-crouse-warden-kansas-state-penitentiary-ca10-1964.