William N. Grosch v. Curtis W. Tarr, the National Director of Selective Service

Fourth Circuit

William N. Grosch v. Curtis W. Tarr, the National Director of Selective Service

453 F.2d 1337, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11775

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 18, 1972·No. 71-1862·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant sought declaratory and injunctive relief to require a reopening of his classification after notice of induction by his Selective Service Board. Relief was denied by the District Court on the basis of Section 10(b) of the Selective Service Act of 1967, which prohibits judicial review of the classification of a registrant after the issuance of an order of induction. We affirm. The Courts have, it is true, established certain minor exceptions to the prohibition on judicial review as prescribed by Section 10(b) 1 but the registrant did not bring himself within such exceptions.

Affirmed.

1

. See, Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11 (1968) 393 U.S. 233, 89 S.Ct. 414, 21 L.Ed.2d 402; Breen v. Selective Service Local Board (1970) 396 U.S. 460, 90 S.Ct. 661, 24 L.Ed.2d 653, and Grosfeld v. Morris (4th Cir. 1971) 448 F.2d 1004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The appellant sought declaratory and injunctive relief to require a reopening of his classification after notice of induction by his Selective Service Board. Relief was denied by the District Court on the basis of Section 10(b) of the Selective Service Act of 1967, which prohibits judicial review of the classification of a registrant after the issuance of an order of induction. We affirm. The Courts have, it is true, established certain minor exceptions to the prohibition on judicial review as prescribed by Section 10(b) 1 but the registrant did not bring himself within such exceptions.

Affirmed.

1

. See, Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11 (1968) 393 U.S. 233, 89 S.Ct. 414, 21 L.Ed.2d 402; Breen v. Selective Service Local Board (1970) 396 U.S. 460, 90 S.Ct. 661, 24 L.Ed.2d 653, and Grosfeld v. Morris (4th Cir. 1971) 448 F.2d 1004.

William N. Grosch v. Curtis W. Tarr, the National Director of Selective Service, 453 F.2d 1337, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11775 (4th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

453 F.2d 1337 (William N. Grosch v. Curtis W. Tarr, the National Director of Selective Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related