William McKinney v. Pat Anderson Carol Ployer H.L. Whitley George W. Sumner John Nye
5 F.3d 365, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6923, 93 Daily Journal DAR 11818, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23754, 1993 WL 349777
This text of 5 F.3d 365 (William McKinney v. Pat Anderson Carol Ployer H.L. Whitley George W. Sumner John Nye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
William McKinney v. Pat Anderson Carol Ployer H.L. Whitley George W. Sumner John Nye, 5 F.3d 365, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6923, 93 Daily Journal DAR 11818, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23754, 1993 WL 349777 (9th Cir. 1993).
Opinion
The United States Supreme Court has affirmed the judgment of this court published at 959 F.2d 853. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court in Helling, et al. v. McKinney, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 2475, 125 L.Ed.2d 22 (1993).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Helling v. McKinney
509 U.S. 25 (Supreme Court, 1993)
William McKinney v. Pat Anderson, Carol Ployer, H.L. Whitley, George W. Sumner, John Nye
959 F.2d 853 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 F.3d 365, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6923, 93 Daily Journal DAR 11818, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23754, 1993 WL 349777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-mckinney-v-pat-anderson-carol-ployer-hl-whitley-george-w-sumner-ca9-1993.