William McKinney v. Pat Anderson Carol Ployer H.L. Whitley George W. Sumner John Nye
5 F.3d 365, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6923, 93 Daily Journal DAR 11818, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23754, 1993 WL 349777
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in William McKinney v. Pat Anderson Carol Ployer H.L. Whitley George W. Sumner John Nye. Read the opinion of the Court — 924 F.2d 1500 →
Opinion
The United States Supreme Court has affirmed the judgment of this court published at 959 F.2d 853. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court in Helling, et al. v. McKinney, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 2475, 125 L.Ed.2d 22 (1993).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William McKinney v. Pat Anderson Carol Ployer H.L. Whitley George W. Sumner John Nye, 5 F.3d 365, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6923, 93 Daily Journal DAR 11818, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23754, 1993 WL 349777 (9th Cir. 1993).
5 F.3d 365 (William McKinney v. Pat Anderson Carol Ployer H.L. Whitley George W. Sumner John Nye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Helling v. McKinney
509 U.S. 25 (Supreme Court, 1993)
William McKinney v. Pat Anderson, Carol Ployer, H.L. Whitley, George W. Sumner, John Nye
959 F.2d 853 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)