William McArthur Wellons v. Director, Department of Corrections Attorney General of Virginia

865 F.2d 1261, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 18636, 1988 WL 142981
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 1988
Docket88-6769
StatusUnpublished

This text of 865 F.2d 1261 (William McArthur Wellons v. Director, Department of Corrections Attorney General of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William McArthur Wellons v. Director, Department of Corrections Attorney General of Virginia, 865 F.2d 1261, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 18636, 1988 WL 142981 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

865 F.2d 1261
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William McArthur WELLONS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Attorney General of
Virginia, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 88-6769.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 3, 1988.
Decided: Dec. 27, 1988.

William McArthur Wellons, appellant pro se.

Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr. (Office of the Attorney General of Virginia), for appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

William McArthur Wellons seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wellons v. Director, Department of Corrections, C/A No. 88-347-R (E.D.Va. Aug. 17, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Martin
865 F.2d 1261 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
865 F.2d 1261, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 18636, 1988 WL 142981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-mcarthur-wellons-v-director-department-of--ca4-1988.