William Mabry, II v. Yarhonda Highsmith

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 28, 2022
DocketA22A1534
StatusPublished

This text of William Mabry, II v. Yarhonda Highsmith (William Mabry, II v. Yarhonda Highsmith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Mabry, II v. Yarhonda Highsmith, (Ga. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 28, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A1534. WILLIAM MABRY, II v. YARHONDA HIGHSMITH.

In January 2022, Yarhonda Highsmith obtained a family violence protective order against William Mabry, II. In February 2022, Mabry moved to modify, or in the alternative, dissolve the protective order. The trial court denied Mabry’s motion. Mabry then filed this appeal. The trial court’s order, however, is not subject to direct appeal. Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), a party must follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review in a domestic relations case, including actions arising under the Family Violence Act. See Schmidt v. Schmidt, 270 Ga. 461, 461 (1) (510 SE2d 810) (1999). “[T]he term ‘family violence’ means . . . acts between past or present spouses, persons who are parents of the same child, parents and children, stepparents and stepchildren, foster parents and foster children, or other persons living or formerly living in the same household[.]” OCGA § 19-13-1. “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Mabry’s failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/28/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schmidt v. Schmidt
510 S.E.2d 810 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)
Smoak v. Department of Human Resources
471 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
William Mabry, II v. Yarhonda Highsmith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-mabry-ii-v-yarhonda-highsmith-gactapp-2022.