William M. Windsor v. Sean D. Fleming
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-14-00392-CV
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR, Appellant v.
SEAN D. FLEMING, Appellee
From the 378th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 88611
ORDER
A document entitled “Appellant’s Brief” was received from appellant, William
M. Windsor and filed with the Court on June 25, 2015. Windsor’s brief in this matter is
premature. Neither the clerk’s record nor the reporter’s record in this appeal have been
filed. An appellant’s brief is not due until 30 days after the clerk’s record or the
reporter’s record is filed, whichever is later. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6. Because it was filed
before the clerk’s record and reporter’s record were even prepared, the “brief” does not contain the necessary references to the official record to be a proper brief. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 38.1. Accordingly, the “Appellant’s Brief” is stricken.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Brief stricken Order issued and filed July 16, 2015
Windsor v. Fleming Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William M. Windsor v. Sean D. Fleming (William M. Windsor v. Sean D. Fleming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.