William M. Windsor v. Sean D. Fleming

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in William M. Windsor v. Sean D. Fleming. Read the opinion of the Court — 532 S.W.3d 825
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 16, 2015·No. 10-14-00392-CV·Published

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00392-CV

WILLIAM M. WINDSOR, Appellant v.

SEAN D. FLEMING, Appellee

From the 378th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 88611

ORDER

A document entitled “Appellant’s Brief” was received from appellant, William

M. Windsor and filed with the Court on June 25, 2015. Windsor’s brief in this matter is

premature. Neither the clerk’s record nor the reporter’s record in this appeal have been

filed. An appellant’s brief is not due until 30 days after the clerk’s record or the

reporter’s record is filed, whichever is later. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6. Because it was filed

before the clerk’s record and reporter’s record were even prepared, the “brief” does not contain the necessary references to the official record to be a proper brief. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.1. Accordingly, the “Appellant’s Brief” is stricken.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Brief stricken Order issued and filed July 16, 2015

Windsor v. Fleming Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William M. Windsor v. Sean D. Fleming, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

William M. Windsor v. Sean D. Fleming (William M. Windsor v. Sean D. Fleming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.