William M. Sherman v. Chuc Dinh, M.D.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 31, 2001
Docket13-00-00658-CV
StatusPublished

This text of William M. Sherman v. Chuc Dinh, M.D. (William M. Sherman v. Chuc Dinh, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William M. Sherman v. Chuc Dinh, M.D., (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-00-658-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

WILLIAM M. SHERMAN , Appellant,

v.

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH AT GALVESTON , Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 10th District Court

of Galveston County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, WILLIAM M. SHERMAN , attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 10th District Court of Galveston County, Texas, in cause number 99CV0970 . The order in this cause was signed on August 22, 2000 . Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b), appellant's notice of accelerated appeal was due on September 11, 2000 , but was not filed until September 19, 2000 .

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 31st day of August, 2001 .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
William M. Sherman v. Chuc Dinh, M.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-m-sherman-v-chuc-dinh-md-texapp-2001.