William M. Lewis, Jr. v. Palms Associates

Fourth Circuit

William M. Lewis, Jr. v. Palms Associates

57 F.3d 1066, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21741, 1995 WL 352528

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 1995

Docket94-2291

StatusPublished

This text of 57 F.3d 1066 (William M. Lewis, Jr. v. Palms Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William M. Lewis, Jr. v. Palms Associates, 57 F.3d 1066, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21741, 1995 WL 352528 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

57 F.3d 1066
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William M. LEWIS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PALMS ASSOCIATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-2291.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 13, 1995.

William M. Lewis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Mark Feathers, Kaufman & Canoles, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing Appellant's complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lewis v. Palms Assoc., No. CA-94-352 (E.D. Va. July 20 & Sept. 16, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

57 F.3d 1066
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William M. LEWIS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PALMS ASSOCIATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-2291.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 13, 1995.

William M. Lewis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Mark Feathers, Kaufman & Canoles, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing Appellant's complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lewis v. Palms Assoc., No. CA-94-352 (E.D. Va. July 20 & Sept. 16, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 F.3d 1066, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21741, 1995 WL 352528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-m-lewis-jr-v-palms-associates-ca4-1995.