William M. Lewis, Jr. v. Palms Associates

57 F.3d 1066, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21741, 1995 WL 352528
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 13, 1995·No. 94-2291·Published

Opinion

57 F.3d 1066
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William M. LEWIS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PALMS ASSOCIATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-2291.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 13, 1995.

William M. Lewis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Mark Feathers, Kaufman & Canoles, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing Appellant's complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lewis v. Palms Assoc., No. CA-94-352 (E.D. Va. July 20 & Sept. 16, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William M. Lewis, Jr. v. Palms Associates, 57 F.3d 1066, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21741, 1995 WL 352528 (4th Cir. 1995).

57 F.3d 1066 (William M. Lewis, Jr. v. Palms Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.