WILLIAM M. HEFLEY vs CHRISTOPHER HOLMQUIST
This text of WILLIAM M. HEFLEY vs CHRISTOPHER HOLMQUIST (WILLIAM M. HEFLEY vs CHRISTOPHER HOLMQUIST) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
WILLIAM M. HEFLEY,
Petitioner, Case No. 5D23-1692 v. LT Case No. 2017-CA-689
CHRISTOPHER HOLMQUIST,
Respondent.
________________________________/
Decision filed June 6, 2023
Petition for Writ of Prohibition, Michael J. Rudisill, Respondent Judge.
William M. Hefley, Lake Mary, pro se.
Michael M. Brownlee, of The Brownlee Law Firm, Orlando, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
DENIED.
MAKAR, BOATWRIGHT and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
WILLIAM M. HEFLEY vs CHRISTOPHER HOLMQUIST, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-m-hefley-vs-christopher-holmquist-fladistctapp-2023.