William M. Bishop and Pinnacle Potash International, Ltd v. E. Barger Miller, III and Reunion Potash Company
This text of William M. Bishop and Pinnacle Potash International, Ltd v. E. Barger Miller, III and Reunion Potash Company (William M. Bishop and Pinnacle Potash International, Ltd v. E. Barger Miller, III and Reunion Potash Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
September 12, 2013
JUDGMENT
The Fourteenth Court of Appeals WILLIAM M. BISHOP AND PINNACLE POTASH INTERNATIONAL, LTD, Appellants
NO. 14-12-00264-CV V.
E. BARGER MILLER, III AND REUNION POTASH COMPANY, Appellees ________________________________
REUNION POTASH COMPANY, Appellant NO. 14-12-00318-CV V.
WILLIAM M. BISHOP AND PINNACLE POTASH INTERNATIONAL, LTD, Appellees ________________________________
These consolidated appeals from the trial court’s judgment signed March 27, 2012, were heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.
We order all parties to pay their own costs incurred in this appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William M. Bishop and Pinnacle Potash International, Ltd v. E. Barger Miller, III and Reunion Potash Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-m-bishop-and-pinnacle-potash-international-texapp-2013.