William Lyle Woratzeck v. James R. Ricketts, and Donald Wawrzaszek

Ninth Circuit

William Lyle Woratzeck v. James R. Ricketts, and Donald Wawrzaszek

859 F.2d 1559, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15243, 1988 WL 117027

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedNovember 7, 1988

Docket85-2367

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 859 F.2d 1559 (William Lyle Woratzeck v. James R. Ricketts, and Donald Wawrzaszek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William Lyle Woratzeck v. James R. Ricketts, and Donald Wawrzaszek, 859 F.2d 1559, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15243, 1988 WL 117027 (9th Cir. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

The Supreme Court, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2815, 100 L.Ed.2d 916, has ordered the judgment vacated and remanded the cause to us “for further consideration in light of Maynard v. Cartwright, 486 U.S. - [108 S.Ct. 1853, 100 L.Ed.2d 372] (1988).” In compliance with the Supreme Court’s mandate, we hereby vacate the district court’s judgment and remand for further consideration in light of Maynard.

The district court is advised that Adamson v. Ricketts, 789 F.2d 722 (9th Cir.1986) (en banc), rev’d, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2680, 97 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987), is pending before this court en banc. That decision, when filed, should also be considered by the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Supreme Court, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2815, 100 L.Ed.2d 916, has ordered the judgment vacated and remanded the cause to us “for further consideration in light of Maynard v. Cartwright, 486 U.S. - [108 S.Ct. 1853, 100 L.Ed.2d 372] (1988).” In compliance with the Supreme Court’s mandate, we hereby vacate the district court’s judgment and remand for further consideration in light of Maynard.

The district court is advised that Adamson v. Ricketts, 789 F.2d 722 (9th Cir.1986) (en banc), rev’d, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2680, 97 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987), is pending before this court en banc. That decision, when filed, should also be considered by the district court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

859 F.2d 1559, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15243, 1988 WL 117027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-lyle-woratzeck-v-james-r-ricketts-and-donald-wawrzaszek-ca9-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack