William Lyle Woratzeck v. James R. Ricketts, and Donald Wawrzaszek

859 F.2d 1559, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15243, 1988 WL 117027
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 7, 1988·No. 85-2367·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The Supreme Court, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2815, 100 L.Ed.2d 916, has ordered the judgment vacated and remanded the cause to us “for further consideration in light of Maynard v. Cartwright, 486 U.S. - [108 S.Ct. 1853, 100 L.Ed.2d 372] (1988).” In compliance with the Supreme Court’s mandate, we hereby vacate the district court’s judgment and remand for further consideration in light of Maynard.

The district court is advised that Adamson v. Ricketts, 789 F.2d 722 (9th Cir.1986) (en banc), rev’d, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2680, 97 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987), is pending before this court en banc. That decision, when filed, should also be considered by the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Lyle Woratzeck v. James R. Ricketts, and Donald Wawrzaszek, 859 F.2d 1559, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15243, 1988 WL 117027 (9th Cir. 1988).

859 F.2d 1559 (William Lyle Woratzeck v. James R. Ricketts, and Donald Wawrzaszek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woratzeck v. Lewis
863 F. Supp. 1079 (D. Arizona, 1994)
State v. Schaefer
790 P.2d 281 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1990)