William Long v. John Boudreaux
This text of William Long v. John Boudreaux (William Long v. John Boudreaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-07-00560-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________
WILLIAM LONG, Appellant,
v.
JOHN BOUDREAUX, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 130th District Court of Matagorda County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justices Garza, Benavides, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on May 19, 2008. On June 3,
2008, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and
that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly
injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, appellant has neither filed
his brief in this matter nor otherwise responded to the Court’s notices.
Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX . R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 21st day of August, 2008.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William Long v. John Boudreaux, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-long-v-john-boudreaux-texapp-2008.