William Lee Thompson v. State of Florida
Opinion
Supreme Court of Florida
THURSDAY, JUNE 23, 2022
CASE NO.: SC20-1847
Lower Tribunal No(s).:
131976CF003350B000XX
WILLIAM LEE THOMPSON vs. STATE OF FLORIDA Appellant(s) Appellee(s)
Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied.
CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, MUÑIZ, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur. LABARGA, J., concurs with an opinion.
LABARGA, J., concurring.
I continue to adhere to my dissent in Thompson v. State, 47 Fla. L. Weekly S99 (Fla. Mar. 31, 2022), wherein I reaffirmed my dissenting view in Phillips v. State, 299 So. 3d 1013 (Fla. 2020), and my belief that Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. 701 (2014), applies retroactively.
However, I agree that Thompson has not established a basis for rehearing, and consequently, I have voted to deny rehearing.
CASE NO.: SC20-1847 Page Two
A True Copy Test:
so Served: HON. MARISA TINKLER-MENDEZ HON. HARVEY RUVIN BRITTNEY NICOLE LACY JENNIFER A. DAVIS MARIE-LOUISE SAMUELS PARMER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William Lee Thompson v. State of Florida (William Lee Thompson v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.