William Lee Jackson, Jr. v. Clayton Bryan Stauffer and Black Label Services, Incorporated
Opinion
Opinion filed August 7, 2025
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals
No. 11-25-00174-CV
WILLIAM LEE JACKSON, JR., Appellant V.
CLAYTON BRYAN STAUFFER AND BLACK LABEL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Appellees
On Appeal from the 161st District Court Ector County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. B-23-05-466-CV
MEMORANDUM OPINION On June 30, 2025, Appellant filed in this court a motion to extend time to file his petition for permissive appeal of the trial court’s order granting Appellee Black Label Services, Incorporated’s motion for partial summary judgment. TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3(d); see TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d), (f) (West Supp. 2024). In the motion, Appellant requested an extension to secure a modified order that complied with Section 51.014(d) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies
Code. See CIV. PRAC. & REM. § 51.014(d). Appellant filed his petition for permissive appeal on July 11, 2025, which he now seeks to withdraw. In his unopposed motion, Appellant states that he wishes to withdraw his petition given the impending trial date and “in light of considerations of judicial economy.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).
We grant Appellant’s motion and dismiss his petition for permissive appeal.
We dismiss his motion to extend time to file his petition as moot.
W. STACY TROTTER JUSTICE
August 7, 2025 Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William Lee Jackson, Jr. v. Clayton Bryan Stauffer and Black Label Services, Incorporated (William Lee Jackson, Jr. v. Clayton Bryan Stauffer and Black Label Services, Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.