William Lee Anderson, II v. Philip H. Witherspoon

704 F. App'x 238
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 22, 2017·No. 17-6667·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Lee Anderson, II, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Anderson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Witherspoon, No. 7:15-cv-00236-MFU-JCH, 2017 WL 1194739 (W.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process,

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Lee Anderson, II v. Philip H. Witherspoon, 704 F. App'x 238 (4th Cir. 2017).

704 F. App'x 238 (William Lee Anderson, II v. Philip H. Witherspoon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related