William Lebron Church v. C.E. Thompson Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia

907 F.2d 1137, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9859, 1990 WL 86357
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 19, 1990
Docket90-6547
StatusUnpublished

This text of 907 F.2d 1137 (William Lebron Church v. C.E. Thompson Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Lebron Church v. C.E. Thompson Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 907 F.2d 1137, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9859, 1990 WL 86357 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

907 F.2d 1137
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Lebron CHURCH, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
C.E. THOMPSON; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 90-6547.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 4, 1990.
Decided June 19, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, United States Magistrate. (C/A No. 89-537-R)

William Lebron Church, appellant pro se.

Katherine Baldwin Toone, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

William Lebron Church seeks to appeal the magistrate's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate. Church v. Thompson, C/A No. 89-537-R (E.D.Va. Mar. 14, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foxx v. Baines
907 F.2d 1137 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
907 F.2d 1137, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9859, 1990 WL 86357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-lebron-church-v-ce-thompson-attorney-general-of-the-commonwealth-ca4-1990.