William Langford Hodge and Robert Branch v. United States

271 F.2d 52
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 28, 1959·No. 17704_1·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only insistence on error is in the district court’s refusal to allow appellants’ counsel forty minutes as requested for argument to the jury and the allowance instead of thirty minutes. See Rossi v. United States, 8 Cir., 1925, 9 F.2d 362, 368. We find no abuse of discretion. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Langford Hodge and Robert Branch v. United States, 271 F.2d 52 (5th Cir. 1959).

271 F.2d 52 (William Langford Hodge and Robert Branch v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. David Boston
194 F. App'x 890 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
Jeter v. St. Regis Paper Co.
507 F.2d 973 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
Jeter v. St. Regis Paper Co.
507 F.2d 973 (Third Circuit, 1975)