William Langford Hodge and Robert Branch v. United States

271 F.2d 52
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 28, 1959
Docket17704_1
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 271 F.2d 52 (William Langford Hodge and Robert Branch v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Langford Hodge and Robert Branch v. United States, 271 F.2d 52 (5th Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only insistence on error is in the district court’s refusal to allow appellants’ counsel forty minutes as requested for argument to the jury and the allowance instead of thirty minutes. See Rossi v. United States, 8 Cir., 1925, 9 F.2d 362, 368. We find no abuse of discretion. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. David Boston
194 F. App'x 890 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
Jeter v. St. Regis Paper Co.
507 F.2d 973 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
Jeter v. St. Regis Paper Co.
507 F.2d 973 (Third Circuit, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 F.2d 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-langford-hodge-and-robert-branch-v-united-states-ca5-1959.