William L. Pitts v. United States

237 F.2d 217, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 63
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedOctober 4, 1956
Docket13333_1
StatusPublished

This text of 237 F.2d 217 (William L. Pitts v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William L. Pitts v. United States, 237 F.2d 217, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 63 (D.C. Cir. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William L. Pitts was charged in the first count of an indictment with assaulting one Jordan with a dangerous weapon, and in- the second count with a similar assault upon one Langford. He was found guilty of both offenses. On appeal he criticises the trial court’s instructions on assault and self-defense. We observe that the defendant did not object to the judge’s charge and offered no instructions. He therefore may not assign as error any portion of the charge or any omission therefrom. Rule 30, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 1

Had the points now urged been saved, we should reject the criticisms of the court’s charge, which seems to us to be complete, adequate and correct.

Affirmed.

FAHY, Circuit Judge, concurs in the result.
1

. 18 U.S.C.A.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 F.2d 217, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-l-pitts-v-united-states-cadc-1956.