William L. Mantha Co. v. De Graff
This text of 242 A.D. 666 (William L. Mantha Co. v. De Graff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order appealed from reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, motion denied, verdict reinstated and judgment directed to be entered thereon, with costs. In our opinion the testimony given by the witness Freiman was not concerning any personal transaction with the deceased. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-l-mantha-co-v-de-graff-nyappdiv-1934.