William L. Mantha Co. v. De Graff
242 A.D. 666
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order appealed from reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, motion denied, verdict reinstated and judgment directed to be entered thereon, with costs. In our opinion the testimony given by the witness Freiman was not concerning any personal transaction with the deceased. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William L. Mantha Co. v. De Graff, 242 A.D. 666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 666 (William L. Mantha Co. v. De Graff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Trotti v. Estate of Buchanan
272 A.D.2d 660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Accounting of Finch
196 Misc. 527 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1949)
Claim of Botti v. Estate of Horton
254 A.D. 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)