William L. Deering v. Edward Meese Norman Carlson U.S. Parole Commission William R. Story Paul Helo Ray Essex Beverly Sharp

Sixth Circuit

William L. Deering v. Edward Meese Norman Carlson U.S. Parole Commission William R. Story Paul Helo Ray Essex Beverly Sharp

852 F.2d 1287, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10162, 1988 WL 79433

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedAugust 1, 1988

Docket88-5010

StatusUnpublished

This text of 852 F.2d 1287 (William L. Deering v. Edward Meese Norman Carlson U.S. Parole Commission William R. Story Paul Helo Ray Essex Beverly Sharp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William L. Deering v. Edward Meese Norman Carlson U.S. Parole Commission William R. Story Paul Helo Ray Essex Beverly Sharp, 852 F.2d 1287, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10162, 1988 WL 79433 (6th Cir. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

852 F.2d 1287

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
William L. DEERING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward MEESE; Norman Carlson; U.S. Parole Commission;
William R. Story; Paul Helo; Ray Essex; Beverly
Sharp, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-5010.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 1, 1988.

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr. and WELLFORD Circuit Judges, and JAMES H. JARVIS, District Judge.*

ORDER

This appeal has been referred to this panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

A review of the record reflects that appellant has appealed from a December 22, 1987 protective order with regard to interrogatories. A protective order is a discovery order that is nonappealable. Dow Chemical Co. v. Taylor, 519 F.2d 352 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1033 (1975). Therefore, this appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

*

The Honorable James H. Jarvis, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI